What method is recommended by TRADOC Regulation 350-6 for incorporating feedback in training?

Using after-action reviews is the recommended method in TRADOC Regulation 350-6 for incorporating feedback in training because these reviews provide a structured way for participants to reflect on their performance and the training experience. After-action reviews allow trainers and trainees to discuss what went well, what could be improved, and what lessons were learned during the training sessions. This reflective process fosters continuous improvement, enhances learning outcomes, and ensures that future training is more effective by addressing any gaps identified in performance.

In contrast to this method, ignoring previous lessons would prevent growth and learning from past experiences, rendering training ineffective. Conducting polls before training may gather initial opinions but does not facilitate a detailed exploration of performance and outcomes. Relying solely on trainer experience may limit the inclusion of diverse perspectives and feedback that can arise from a comprehensive review process. By leveraging after-action reviews, the training program can evolve and adapt based on actual experiences rather than assumptions or singular perspectives.